The photographs themselves with a superficial color abstraction with arbitrary closeups and with a primary visual reference search seek artistic anointing. These images do not have the honesty of description nor even the sincerity of a postcard where the standardized beauty the cliché is reduced to a symbol. Even the advertising promotion of the books plays the artistic argument. If I remember correctly the press releases for the first album informed us that it was printed on art paper with art ink and also gave some more precise information about the origin of these materials. While at the same time the presentation of the books was done provocatively and unjustifiably through featured museums and ancient theaters. One could of course note that none of this is inherently bad and that we have all too often seen a completely indifferent gift.
However the love of photography and art compels e-commerce photo editing us to think that the wellintentioned and at the same time ignorant public cannot distinguish the precious from the precious in art nor the honest from the pretentious. No artist is sure that he can offer anything of value but he can move in that direction. Honesty which he can offer us will help him avoid dangerous beautification. Our lives need living room books as well as light music fun movies and crime novels Ever more popular and ever simpler photography continues to be subterraneanly difficult and apparently misunderstood. What actually troubles those who are seriously concerned with it must be sought primarily in its schizophrenic nature which constantly negates and overturns any previous certainty about its qualities and practice.
The problems start from the definition of the identity of the photographer. So who is a photographer since almost all people take photos What is it that defines a person's special relationship with photography and what differentiates him from the common citizen when the latter takes photos almost every day even with his mobile phone And if the status of a professional photographer is determined by the tax code that of an artist or serious amateur is much more difficult to define and above all to distinguish from that of every person who for a variety of reasons photographically captures the world around him. The contradictions continue with the path of a photographer from the role of recorder of memories to that of creator.